Protect Your Identity on Facebook

On June 9, 2009 the well-known social networking site Facebook announced the introduction of a new policy to enable users to register personalized usernames as personal URLS in the form:  www.facebook.com/yourname, which will then link to the user's Facebook profile.  Additionally, those administering groups or other Facebook pages may similarly select their own URL for that page.  The initiative starts at 12:01 EDT on Saturday, June 13, 2009 for those whom have signed up with Facebook prior to May 31, 2009 or which have used a particular user profile prior to June 9, 2009.

Additionally, however, the introduction of this policy raises the potential for the adoption of personal URLs which may be confusingly similar or identical to trademarks and brand names thereby resulting in "Facebook squatting".  Anticipating this possibility and, in advance of the Saturday launch, Facebook Inc. has enabled trademark owners to use an on line form to register their trademarks with Facebook in order to prevent third parties from utilize a trademark as part of a URL. 

In order to mitigate against negative repercussions it is advisable that trademark owners register their marks with Facebook in order to avoid potential confusion or negative consequences such as diminished goodwill, it is recommended that you contact Facebook Inc. using the online form or contact our office to arrange for a recordal of your rights.

Should you wish to discuss the implications of this policy on your trademarks please contact us.

On June 9, 2009 the well-known social networking site Facebook announced the introduction of a new policy to enable users to register personalized usernames as personal URLS in the form:  www.facebook.com/yourname, which will then link to the user's Facebook profile.  Additionally, those administering groups or other Facebook pages may similarly select their own URL for that page.  The initiative starts at 12:01 EDT on Saturday, June 13, 2009 for those whom have signed up with Facebook prior to May 31, 2009 or which have used a particular user profile prior to June 9, 2009.

Additionally, however, the introduction of this policy raises the potential for the adoption of personal URLs which may be confusingly similar or identical to trademarks and brand names thereby resulting in "Facebook squatting".  Anticipating this possibility and, in advance of the Saturday launch, Facebook Inc. has enabled trademark owners to use an on line form to register their trademarks with Facebook in order to prevent third parties from utilize a trademark as part of a URL. 

The Facebook FAQ is available here and provides useful information regarding the new policy and strategies to address intellectual property rights.

In order to mitigate against negative repercussions it is advisable that trademark owners register their marks with Facebook in order to avoid potential confusion or negative consequences such as diminished goodwill, it is recommended that you contact Facebook Inc. using the online form or contact our office to arrange for a recordal of your rights.

Additionally, if you become aware of a third party adopting a personal URL, Facebook Inc. has introduced an IP infringement form to enable rights holders to provide formal notice regarding your pre-existing rights.

Overall, the introduction of personal URLs is intended to enable usage of a Facebook username as a search term while in any search engine.  Nevertheless, the unintended consequences for this development are three-fold:  (1) users must be careful to establish appropriate privacy and security settings to avoid publicly disseminating personal information; (2) trademark owners will be required to police their trademark over Facebook; and (3) trademark owners with pending applications or common law trademark in different jurisdictions may face challenges over the ownership of a particular Facebook URL.  Moreover, it is unclear how Facebook intends to resolve contests between different and perhaps competing rights holders for the same trademark in different jurisdictions or similarly, as between distributors, licensees and licensors, etc.

Should you wish to discuss the implications of this policy on your trademarks please contact us.

Registered vs. Unregistered Trademarks - Common Law Protection

In Canada there are two streams of trademark protection: the registration system and the unregistered or common law approach. Accordingly, any introduction to trademark law in Canada necessitates a discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of pursuing and enforcing trademark rights utilizing either approach. In this post I will review some of the advantages and disadvantages of unregistered trademarks.

For individuals, businesses and other organizations utilizing unregistered trademarks in conducting business, they have placed reliance upon common law trademark protections. Generally speaking, a company satisfying the basic requirements for establishing common law trademark rights can utilize such rights to enforce or restrain a competitor from “passing off” its goods and/or services as those of the rights owner. For some individuals and entities, particularly entrepreneurs and start-ups, this approach to trademark protection is cost effective for the purpose of immediate adoption of a trademark while providing some avenues of rights enforcement since you avoid the costs associated with obtaining legal advice, running trademark searches and filing a trademark application.

Reliance upon common law trademark rights does, however, have several disadvantages. In particular, such rights are limited to the geographic area in which the particular unregistered trademark is known. For example, a company operating in the Maritime region of Canada would be in a position to defend and enforce its common law trademark rights against others operating within (a) the Maritime region and (b) within the same (and/or potentially, an overlapping) channel of trade. Accordingly, that same company would have no ability to restrain or otherwise prevent the use of the same mark within the same channel of trade throughout Western Canada.
Perhaps the clearest disadvantage of reliance upon common law rights involves the costs associated with enforcement. Indeed, over the longer term, such costs can exceed those associated with seeking trademark registration due to the time and financial expense associated with assembling the evidentiary records necessary to defend and/or enforce common law trademark rights. Since the onus is on the party asserting common law rights to substantiate such claims, it will be necessary to maintain and produce records evidencing use of the mark – and such a process has the potential of greatly exceeding the costs associated with running a comprehensive trademark search and seeking trademark registration.

As a final note, reliance upon common law trademark rights is increasingly risky as commercial use of the internet expands to most, if not all, trade channels. A reluctance to obtain a trademark registration due to the initial costs associated with such a pursuit may result in costs exponentially greater if it becomes necessary to defend or enforce common law rights against a competitor with a large and/or growing internet presence.